A Consequentialist Action Is The Moral Worth Of An Act

A consequentialist action is a utilitarian theory. The utilitarian theory is a choice between two acts that can maximize utility for the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarianism is the moral worth of an act. Utilitarian takes the right proportion of utilities to promote happiness and prevent pain. Utilities is the expressed quality of happiness or satisfaction one gets from something (Mossier, 2013). Happiness comes in many levels of preference. However, the downside to utilitarianism is identifying different levels of pleasure. Identifying different levels of pleasure can be counteracted by an irrespective feelings to a moral obligation making the pleasure more desirable (Mills, 2008). Utilitarian is not the agent’s own greatest happiness, but the greatest amount of happiness altogether. One of the most important social roles is conscious gratification in convey what is gendered equality on jobs, in health care, and with educatio n utilizing the utilitarian theory. Acts like changing policies to promote gender equality that utilize skills and knowledge of women for the greatest number of people from the greatest amount of happiness is utilitarianism. Gender equality ought to be about equal justice. Held (n.d) contrasts the history of male and female ethics in an article titled â€Å"Feminist Transformations of Moral Theory.† Held (n.d.) writes, â€Å"but, we can hope to agree on the minimal conditions for justice, for coexistenceShow MoreRelatedPeter Singer: Famine, Affluence, and Morality Essay1399 Words   |  6 Pagesdeontological ethics (DE) mutually maintain that there is a right action that we morally ought to do. However, these normative ethical theories differ in the derivation of what is valued. In the case of human rights, both accounts are supportive of human rights, but for different reasons. Deontological ethics has as its basic thrust, the concept of a duty to do what is right. For one’s actions to be in accordance with DE, those actions must be realized out of a â€Å"notion of right (that) is not derivedRead MoreEssay on Immanuel Kant’s Non- consequentialist Ethical Theory 1369 Words   |  6 Pages1. Introduction According to Immanuel Kant the driving force behind our actions should be dictated by what is inherently good as sole consideration and not be based upon the effects of what such actions may produce such as the case in the consequentialist theory of cause. In this essay Kant’s ethical non-consequentialist theory will be briefly investigated and a comparison drawn between the two different theories in order to establish merit in employment thereof in practice. 2. Kantian Morality CentralRead MoreMoral Issues in Business - Chapter 2 Notes793 Words   |  4 Pagesof Ethics Chapter Summary Points 1. Consequentialist moral theories see the moral rightness or wrongness of actions as a function of their results. If the consequences are sufficiently good, the action is right; if they are sufficiently bad, the action is wrong. However, nonconsequentialist theories see other factors as also relevant to the determination of right and wrong. 2. Egoism is the consequentialist theory that an action is right when it promotes the individual’s bestRead MoreEthical Theories Of Ethical Egoism993 Words   |  4 PagesEthical egoism is a consequentialist normative ethical theory. There are two forms of ethical egoism. The first is individual ethical egoism which states that I should act in ways that are in my own best interest. The second form is universal ethical egoism which states that everyone one should act in their own best interest. In both forms, individuals should only consider others interest to the extent that it benefits their own well-being. The determination of morality is based off whether or notRead MoreKant s The Metaphysic Of Morals845 Words   |  4 PagesPractical Reason in the Moral Law, 127). Kant makes the argument that without good intentions, even if the action itself is morally good, the action has no intrinsic worth. Although he makes a very strong argument, this isn’t accepted by e veryone. In the excerpt Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, Kant presents a profound argument that how right an action is, is determined by intention of the principle that is being acted on. He believes that the outcome of an action is irrelevant because itRead MoreConsequentialist and Non-consequentialist Theories1194 Words   |  5 Pagesof theories, consequentialist and non-consequentialist we are going to see if these theories are accountable for its principles in terms of the standard ethical principles such as truth telling, generosity, misconduct, keeping promises, not offending people, etc. To me not all these theories are not 100% perfect and does not fully account for its principles. Consequentialist: Focuses on the result of an action. The act is considered a good act if the result is good, likewise and act is consideredRead MoreThe Ethics Of The Integrity Objection1336 Words   |  6 Pagesconsequentialism first proposed by Bernard Williams in 1973. It problematizes consequentialist moral philosophy on the grounds that it forces an agent to forfeit their ‘integrity’ – their character and personal values – in order to follow an impartial moral calculus. When an agent performs an action which is morally correct according to a consequentialist calculation, they may experience guilt, sadness, or other negative emotions despite the moral rightness of what they did. Utilitarianism considers such feelingsRead MoreThe Two Shopkeepers- Kantian Ethics and Consequentialism Essay1107 Words   |  5 Pagesin Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals is the issued of two shopkeepers. One shopkeeper is honest with his customers in or der to maintain a positive reputation and improve profits. The second one is honest because he thinks it is right and exercises his respect for the moral law. The first shopkeeper is motivated to be honest by the rewards of a positive reputation and profit. The second is motivated by respect for morally right action. Taking these motivations into considerationRead MoreA Summary of Groundworks of the Metaphysics of Morals by Immanuel Kant1290 Words   |  6 Pages------------------------------------------------- Critique of Practical Reason and Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals Summary Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals, published in 1785, is Kant’s first major work in ethics. Like the Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, the Groundwork is the short and easy-to-read version of what Kant deals with at greater length and complexity in his Critique. The Critique of Practical Reason, published three years later, contains greater detail than theRead MoreEthical Dilemmas : What Should Jean Do? Essay1551 Words   |  7 Pagesmorality is taken to mean moral judgments, standards and rules of conduct†. An ethical dilemma is a situation in which there is no obvious â€Å"right† or â€Å"wrong† solution. In detailed, an ethical dilemma is a complex situation that often involves an apparent mental conflict between moral imperatives, in which to obey one would result in transgressing another (Shaw, 2014). Applying the definition to Jean’s situation in the case, Jean is facing a mental conflict between two moral imperatives. Whether to

To Thomas Jefferson To Benjamin Banneker Analysis

Article 1 – To Thomas Jefferson from Benjamin Banneker. 1791 The author of this letter is Benjamin Banneker, a black American born 1731 in Baltimore County, Maryland. Benjamin was a self-taught almanac author, naturalist and farmer born from a free African American woman and his father being a former slave. The letter Benjamin wrote was to Thomas Jefferson, to offer him a gift, an almanac that he painstakingly calculated and wrote by his own hand. In the course of picking up his pen, he claims to have been motivated further to write on â€Å"that State of tyrannical thraldom, and inhuman captivity, to which too many of my brethren are doomed.† Benjamin argues that he finds it strange, that while Jefferson fought for the inalienable born rights†¦show more content†¦Jefferson argues that because of the pains inflicted on slaves, when freed it would most likely result in a racial conflict that would destroy at least one of the parties involved. Further, he views the differences between white and black people as â€Å"fixed in nature†, concluding that â€Å"blacks†¦are inferior to the whites in the endowments both of body and mind.† On these personal observations Jefferson claims that it would not be worthwhile to abolish slavery as he doubts that black people would add culturally, artistically or scientifically to society. It is clear that attempts were made to justify slavery through a perceived biological and cultural superiority of those of white or European decent at the time. Thomas Jefferson’s words were clearly influential as his opinion that emancipation would be too problematic was shared by those involved in the revision, and the motion was cast down. This document made clear the position held by slave owners and law makers. It also elucidated arguments from biological determinism to justify the continued suffering of African American slaves. Perhaps more importantly the document alluded to, perhaps a more poignant dispute to emancipation, that of the potential for social and economic strive. Gun Control – The Stono Rebellion The Stono Rebellion in a slave rebellion in South Carolina on the 9th SeptemberShow MoreRelatedThomas Jefferson Rhetorical Analysis1011 Words   |  5 PagesMy rhetorical analysis is about a free African-American almanac writer, naturalist, and farmer who fought against slavery and who earned the recognition of many high officials of the time, including Thomas Jefferson. As D.L. Chandler pointed out, Benjamin Banneker, wrote to Thomas Jefferson, on August 19, 1791, to condemn the practice of slavery in the United States. Banneker attempted to persuade Thomas Jefferson of his forbearance of slave practices and the fact that he owned slaves yet pronouncedRead MoreBenjamin Banneker Rhetorical Analysis1326 Words   |  6 PagesBanneker Analysis After the Revolutionary War, and while America was still trying to establish itself, it faced many problems in society, including the issue of race and slavery. There were many Americans who viewed blacks as inferior beings who should be confined to a life of slavery. Thomas Jefferson, the father of The Declaration of Independence, was one of those people. In 1791, Benjamin Banneker, a free and educated black man, responded to Jefferson’s work,c Notes on the State of Virginia, which

The Holocaust Free Essays

The Holocaust, defined as a whole burnt sacrifice was a historical conflict between the Nazis and Jews. In a broader perspective, conflict between the Aryan race and all other inferior races. The primary cause of the Holocaust was the Nazi Party’s rise of power. We will write a custom essay sample on The Holocaust or any similar topic only for you Order Now The social science perspectives of psychology, politics and sociology evaluate the factors that lead up to the primary cause of the Holocaust. Analyzing the conflict in the Holocaust helps to understand a current conflict such as the situation of alleged genocide in Darfur. Psychological factors contributed to the primary conflict of the Holocaust. The Nazi Party was a great supporter of anti-Semitism and their new power allowed them to spread the word easily. Nazi leader Hans Frank expressed the hatred in his Jewish Extermination Speech in 1941, â€Å"if the pack of Jews were to survive the war in Europe while we sacrifice the best of our blood for the preservation of Europe, then this war would still be only a partial success. † The people involved in the Nazi Party were very narrow-minded. Without total execution of all Jews, their plan would be considered a failure. The Nazis set a goal that was unreasonable and because of this unreachable goal, the Nazis were driven to almost insanity to kill off any Jew on the street. Although the Nazis had manipulated themselves into anti-Semitism, they still had to convince the people of Germany that total execution of the Jewish people was normal. Adolf Hitler used all kinds of media as anti-Semitic propaganda. Hans Frank had also said, â€Å"I must ask you to remain unmoved by pleas of pity. We must annihilate the Jews wherever we encounter them, in order to maintain the overall mastery of the Reich. † The Nazi Party even produced an anti-Semitic film called The Eternal Jew that bashed the Jews in every way possible. At one point, the film stated, â€Å"Among the animals, rats represent the rudiment of an insidious and underground destruction, just like the Jews among human beings. † The horrific comments said about the Jews in Hitler’s propaganda was enough to turn Germany into a heartless, full-fledged anti-Semitic nation. Hitler was able to manipulate the minds of people and by doing so, he was able to gather enough followers to carry out his anti-Semitic plans. The political events that took place during the times was also a huge factor to the primary cause of the Holocaust. Not long after Hitler was elected as Chancellor of Germany, he decided to change his leadership into a dictatorship. Hitler’s hunger for power was most likely fueled by his want to promote anti-Semitism. Hitler became extremely powerful and used this to his advantage to speak pessimistically against the Jews. Often, his speech would be something along the lines of this, â€Å"We say that the war will not end as the Jews imagine it will, namely, with the uprooting of the Aryans, but the result of this war will be complete annihilation of the Jews. † Hitler’s unlimited power promised him that no obstacle would get in the way of putting his anti-Semitic ideas into action. Soon after, Anti- Semitism became a government policy. The idea of anti-Semitism was taught to children at schools and was widely promoted by several groups. It was reasonable for the people of Germany to dislike the Jews, but making it a government policy was going overboard. If openly sabotaging and torturing the Jewish people was now legal, an event like the Holocaust to follow seemed to be inevitable. Obviously, if the Holocaust had happened, it shows that Hitler was not yet satisfied with the Jewish Problem. In 1939, Hitler came up with The Final Solution of the Jewish Question. The Final Solution stated that all Jews seen on the street was be killed. By making the Final Solution a governmental law, executing Jews seemed less like a crime and more like a necessary action. The absolute power that the Nazi Party had obtained allowed them to enforce political laws without question and eventually, Nazism took over the country of Germany. The sociological differences between the Jews and the Aryan race caused much conflict between the two races and also added to the primary cause of the Holocaust. The Jews were treated as social outcasts way before the Holocaust even happened. Hitler had built on the already existing anti-Semitism and convinced people that Jews were hindering the development of Germany. Jews were often the scapegoats in many of the nation’s problems. Although no one could prove if that was true, the Jews did not seem like they were disrupting the organization of Germany. Hitler was simply playing the blame game to win over pro-Anti-Semitism. In one of his speeches, Hitler had predicted, â€Å"If the international Jewish financers in and outside of Europe should succeed in plunging the nations once more in a world war, then the esult will not be the Bolshevizing of the Earth, and thus the victory of Jewry but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe†¦ then we shall see which is stronger, the spirit of international Jewry or the will of Germany. † Once again, Hitler refers to the annihilation of all Jews in Europe. If Jewish businesses are causing the German businesses to diminish, then the only reasonable solution wo uld be to get rid of everyone that was hindering the development of Germany. The Nazi Party had stripped the Jews of natural human rights such as citizenship, property and life. Hitler abused his power to torment the Jews and made it seem normal, humane. The interaction between Jews and non-Jews became more hostile. Non-Jews refused to help Jews because they had the constant fear of getting caught by government officials. To avoid that problem, they decided to shut the Jews into confined ghettos. The negativity became more extreme and eventually, the Nazi Party came to a decision that annihilating every Jew was the best solution for the problem. The current conflict of the genocide in Darfur is similar to the Holocaust in all three social science perspectives. The conflict of Darfur was started when a group of rebels had killed Sudanese soldiers. Similarly, Hitler had ordered genocide of the Jews after Herschel Grynszpan, a Jew killed a German diplomat. The government and Janjaweed militia of Sudan targeted rebel African groups and organized a systematic killing. The government encouraged and supported the actions of the Janjaweed militia. Likewise, a high power party was responsible for the rise of the Holocaust. The Nazis and Sudanese government were both encouraged the wiping out of an inferior people group. Psychologically, the government of Sudan tried to manipulate public opinion with misleading information. They had used propaganda to promote negativity towards the rebel groups of the ‘Sudan Liberation Army’ and the ‘Justice and Equality Movement’. The Nazis had used propaganda to promote negative views of the Jews and most likely, the insight posted on the propaganda was based solely on assumptions. Sociologically, the conflicted areas were heavily guarded by the Sudan Liberation Army and the rebels were mostly confined into small spaces. The guards caused hesitance in humanitarian aid because of the fear of death. Non-Jews were reluctant to help Jews because of the constant fear of getting caught by the Nazi government. The Jews were also confined into ghettos which is similar to the rebel communities that live separate from the rest of Darfur. Both inferior groups were treated as social outcasts. with the similar conditions of the victims and same intentions of the government, many people consider Darfur to be the modern Holocaust. Analyzing a historical and current conflict can help us understand the reasons for any general conflict. History has a theory of repeating itself through time. This is evident because about sixty years after the Holocaust, the conflict of Darfur, a similar conflict happened. In general, the conflict of the Holocaust and Darfur happened because of disagreements and disputes with a group of people that was different than their own. Any conflict contains two of more parties with opposing views that are also not content with the other’s presence. A conflict happens because one is not okay with the actions of another. A disagreement of some sort must be present and there must be a failure to compromise for a conflict to form. The Holocaust was caused by many factors in the social science perspectives of psychology, politics and sociology. Hitler was able to manipulate the minds of many people which caused them to believe in a strong anti-Semitic view. The absolute power of the Nazi party legalized anti-Semitic laws and people of the â€Å"Aryan† race constantly spat on the Jews. Not more than 60 years later, a similar conflict in Darfur happened. Both conflicts were systematic, government sponsored genocides that failed to succeed. By analyzing the historical conflict of the Holocaust and the modern conflict of Darfur, it is easier to understand that the reason for any conflict is the dispute and failure to compromise of two or more parties. Conflicts are always happening but by taking a social science perspective and an analytical approach, a conflict can be broken down to be understood with greater knowledge. How to cite The Holocaust, Essay examples The Holocaust Free Essays string(23) " Jews under his thumb\." The Holocaust was a horrible event that took many lives and disturbed may people and was considered to be one of the cruelest acts ever in history. This was a time after World War I and before World War II began. However, this is not where it all started. We will write a custom essay sample on The Holocaust or any similar topic only for you Order Now It all started on April 20, 1889, when an innocent child was brought into the world, by the name of Adolf Hitler. â€Å"Perhaps in trying to understand Hitler’s psyche, we can come closer to understanding how what it is in ourselves that drives us to embrace such an alien world as the Holocaust represents†. (Ferrell, Donald R.The Un-mourned Wound: Reflections on the Psychology of Adolf Hitler. Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. 34, No. 3 (Fall, 1995), pp. 175-197 Published by: Springer) Adolf Hitler was born in Braunau an Inn to an Australian customs official by the name of Alois Schickelgruber Hitler and his third and very young wife, Klara Poezl. In primary school, Hitler was thought to have a very bright academic future in front of him. He also showed outstanding leadership qualities. All of his pupils respected him and he was well liked. (http://www. jewishvirtuallibrary. org/jsource/Holocaust/hitler. tml) In secondary school, Hitler soon realized he was not at the top of his class and was not liked as well as he was in primary school. The only teacher that he liked was a man by the name of, Leopold Potsch, history major. Potsch was a German Nationalist, among many other. He taught Hitler about the first chancellor of the German Empire, Otto von Bismarch. (http://www. spartacus. schoolnet. co. uk/GERhitler. htm) Otto von Bismarch was President of Prussia in 1862 and deliberately provoked the France-Prussian War and â€Å"as a result was able to obtain Alsace and Lorraine from France.To counteract the danger of Russia and France joining forces against Germany, Chancellor Bismarck formed the Triple Alliance in 1879. † (http://www. spartacus. schoolnet. co. uk/FWWbismarck. htm) Bismarch was one of Hitler’s first early historical heroes. By this time, Hitler had a very bad attitude, was lazy, had an unstable temperament, and was deeply hostile towards his strict father. Hitler told his father that he did not want to be in the civil service, but instead wanted to be an artist. His father did not take this news very well, as a matter of fact, he was furious and as a result they had a falling out.The dispute between the two of them ended when Alois Hitler died in 1903. The family owned their own home and received a very generous pension from the civil service, so they did not struggle. (http://www. jewishvirtuallibrary. org/jsource/Holocaust/hitler. html) Hitler was always very close to his hardworking mother, much closer than he was to his father. At the age of fifteen, he did so badly at his examinations that he was told he would have to repeat the grade. He managed to convince his mother to let him drop out without receiving his secondary education qualification. http://www. jewishvirtuallibrary. org/jsource/Holocaust/hitler. html) When Hitler was eighteen, He inherited some money from his father’s will and moved to Vienna to pursue his dream of becoming an artist. He then, applied to the Vienna Academy of Art and the Vienna School of Architecture. He was rejected by both. Not having the heart to tell his mother, he stayed in Vienna and let her believe he was attending school. (http://www. jewishvirtuallibrary. org/jsource/Holocaust/hitler. html) Hitler’s mother died soon after that when he was just nineteen years old in 1908.She died of cancer. He was so heartbroken over her death that he carried a picture in his pocket of her. It is even said that he had it in his hand when he died in 1945. (http://www. jewishvirtuallibrary. org/jsource/Holocaust/hitler. html) In 1909, Hitler was supposed to register for military services, but he was unwilling to serve for Austria because he despised them. When authorities caught up with him four years later he was rejected due to the fact that he was deemed unfit for combat, to weak, and unable to bear a firearm. (http://www. spartacus. schoolnet. co. uk/GERhitler. tm) A fresh start was provided for Hitler when the First World War started. He wanted to prove that Germany was superior to all other European countries. Hitler volunteered for the German Army, in times of war medical examinations were not as crucial. Hitler claimed that when he heard the news of war: â€Å"I was overcome with impetuous enthusiasm, and falling on my knees, wholeheartedly thanked Heaven that I had been granted the happiness to live at this time†. (http://www. spartacus. schoolnet. co. uk/GERhitler. htm) Hitler liked being in the army. He impressed his commanding officers by volunteering for dangerous missions.It seemed like he liked the fact that he was fighting alongside other people for a common goal. One of his fellow soldiers even said that he was â€Å"odd and peculiar† and that Hitler was a very isolated person and would randomly make negative speeches about the Jews and the Marxists. (Hitler, Adolf. Mein Kampf. Volume one, Chapter five: The world War. http://www. hitler. org/writings/Mein_Kampf/mkv1ch05. html) In October of 1918, there was a mustard gas attack and Hitler was temporarily blinded. By the time he recovered the war was over and he was very disappointed. He stayed very isolated after that.He would refuse to even talk to people at times. (Hitler, Adolf. Mein Kampf. Volume one, Chapter five: The world War. http://www. hitler. org/writings/Mein_Kampf/mkv1ch05. html) After the First World War it was said that â€Å"Germany suffered defeat, humiliation, and great amount of debt. In turn, this paved the way for Adolf Hitler and the Nazi’s†. (Davidson, J. W. , DeLay, B. , Heyrman, C. L. , Lytle, M. H. , Stoff, M. B. (2008) Nation of nations: a narrative of the American republic. Boston, Ma. McGraw-Hill) As it was said, Adolf Hitler had very strong leadership qualities, even as a child.That is when Hitler first realized he wanted to be a leader. At the same time, he wanted to get all Jews under his thumb. You read "The Holocaust" in category "Papers" When the Germans surrendered Hitler blamed a lot of people and a number of groups such as, the socialist, liberalist, but most of all he blamed the Jews. This is when Hitler wrote the book Mein Kampf. It was full of racial rantings and this built the platform for the Nazi army. (http://www. history. com/topics/adolf-hitler/videos) Hitler, himself, designed the Swastika flag in Munich in 1920. He discusses in his book, Mein Kampf, what its origin and meaning were and how each shape and color was selected.Kasher, Steve. The Art of Hitler. October, Vol. 59, (Winter, 1992) pp. 48-85. Published by: The MIT Press â€Å"He has the orator’s instinct for exaggeration and popularization and is without conscience or restraint†. This was said by Hans V. Kaltenborn. (Kaltenborn, Hans V. And Hitler, Adolf. . An Interview with Hitler, August 17, 1932) While reading this interview, a person could understand by then his isolation had remained and even got worse. It was very difficult for this man to even get an interview with Hitler to begin with. By 1933, Hitler became Chancellor of Germany and had plenty of practice throwing rallies against Jews.There were even some historical Jews that attended some of these rallies and cheered for Hitler when he emerged. One woman that attended said, â€Å"I am still appalled that I would do such a thing. (Davis, Martha. Dulicai, Dianne. And Viczian, Ildiko. Hitler’s Movement Signature TDR (1988- ), Vol. 36, No. 2 (summer, 1992), pp. 152-172 Published by: The MIT Press) The Nazi’s that came to power in Germany in January 1933, believed that the Germans were radically superior to all other (including the Jews) were an alien threat to the â€Å"German racial community†. This is when the era of the Holocaust began. The Holocaust was the systematic, bureaucratic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of approximately six million Jews by the Nazi regime and its collaborators. †Holocaust† is a word of Greek origin meaning â€Å"sacrifice by fire. † (Dawidowicz, Lucy S. The War Against the Jews, 1933-1945. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1975. http://www. ushmm. org/wlc/en/article. php? ModuleId=10005143) The Jews were not the only ones that were targeted by the Nazis, because of their â€Å"racial inferiority†; there were also the Gypsies (Roma), the disabled, and some of the Slavic people.Others, such as, Communists, socialists, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and Homosexuals were mistreated because of their political, ideological, and behavioral grounds. (http://www. ushmm. org/wlc/en/article. php? ModuleId=10005143) The Jewish population in Europe was over nine million, in 1933. By 1945, the Germans had killed two out of every three European Jews as part of the â€Å"final solution†. Even though Jews were the primary targets for the Nazis, other victims included 200,000 mentally or physically disabled, 200,000 Gypsies, and any German that was living in an institution setting. All these people were murdered in the Euthanasia Program. The so-called â€Å"Euthanasia† program was National Socialist Germany’s first program of mass murder, predating the genocide of European Jewry, which we call the Holocaust. † (Friedlander, Henry. The Origins of Nazi Genocide: From Euthanasia to the Final Solution. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995. http://www. ushmm. org/wlc/en/article. php? ModuleId=10005200) The National Socialist government created concentration camps to hold real and imagined political and ideological opponents. More so, in the time before the war, SS and police incarcerated Jews, Gypsies, and others of ethnic and racial hatred in these camps.Hitler wanted to monitor the Jewish population so; the Germans created ghettos, transit camps, and forced labor camps for the Jews during war years. (Dawidowicz, Lucy S. The War Against the Jews, 1933-1945. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1975. http://www. ushmm. org/wlc/en/article. php? ModuleId=10005143) In June 1941, after the invasion of the Soviet Union, Einsatzgruppen (were squads composed primarily of German SS and police personnel) and, later, militarized battalions of Order Police officials, went behind German lines to complete mass-murder operations against Jews, Roma, and Soviet state and Communist Party officials.German SS and police units murdered more than a million Jewish men, women, and children, and hundreds of thousands of others. Between 1941 and 1944, Nazi German authorities deported millions of Jews from Germany, from occupied territories, to ghettos and killing centers. These camps were called extermination camps, were the Jews were murdered in gassing facilities. (http://fcit. usf. edu/HOLOCAUST/TIMELINE/camps. htm) During the final months of World War II, guards moved camp inmates by train or on forced marches (called death marches) in an attempt to stop the liberation of mass quantities of prisoners.These marches continued until May 7, 1945, the day that the German armed forces surrendered to the Allies. World War II ended the next day on May 8 (V-E day) and the Soviet Union announced the end of the war on Mat 9, 1945. (Yahil, Leni. The Holocaust: The Fate of European Jewry, 1932-1945. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990) Many of the survivors of the Holocaust found shelter in displaced person (DP) camps administered by Allied powers. 700,000 Jews immigrated to Israel, between 1948 and 1951, including 136,000 Jewish displaced persons from Europe. Others immigrated to the United States and other nations.The last DP camp that was opened finally closed in 1957. The unthinkable crimes committed by Hitler during the Holocaust devastated most European Jewish communities and eliminated hundreds of Jewish communities that resided in Eastern Europe. (Yahil, Leni. The Holocaust: The Fate of European Jewry, 1932-1945. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990) Six million Jews were killed during the span of the Holocaust. Adolf Hitler was responsible for every one of these innocent people’s deaths. If it were not for his racial outlooks on life, many of the people that suffered and perished during the Holocaust would have lived to see another day.The Holocaust was a horrible event that took many lives and disturbed may people and was considered to be one of the cruelest acts ever in history. *note* I probably could have gone on for much longer about the Holocaust and all of the mental and emotional suffering that many Jews went through during said time. However, I did not want to get docked points for making it longer than you originally told us to write. I am very passionate about this subject and really appreciate the opportunity to write about it. Thank you. How to cite The Holocaust, Papers The Holocaust Free Essays He abandoned his father, and he moved on to save his own life (824). We can assume that the son didn’t want to stay behind the troop, there was a big chance he would be shoot by Nazis because too slow to move on. In concentration camps, there is no love, no friendships. We will write a custom essay sample on The Holocaust or any similar topic only for you Order Now Even family cannot trust people, people betray each other for better opportunity to be alive. Blade’s father in-law was cheated by his another son in-law, Haskell. Haskell lied he will help the father in-law to stay with family and took the jewelry from him (Spiegel 1 15). The jewelries would help him to read a bad conditions for living but Haskell put the father in-law to death. Betrays from own people is more painful from the crime that Nazis did to the Jews. After Jews were released from concentration camps, they were still suffering pains and guilt from their terrible experience, even the next generations had bad influence on it. In the book Mass, Ninja felt sorry and guilty for her dead parents and siblings, plus she was a sensitive person so she committed suicide and let her son carried guilt after she passed (Spiegel). It is very lucky and difficult can live through the Holocaust, and Ninja was that lucky survivor, but ridiculously, she could alive under the horrible conditions that Nazis put on her, but she committed suicide after all the pain had passed. The lasting effect on Ninja brought more damage than she went in the concentrating camp. Not only sensitive mother can have that strong lasting effect, but also Bladed that smart father totally changed his personality. When Artist’s friend left him, Bladed didn’t say thing to comfort him, â€Å"Friends? Your friends? † (2). Life after the Holocaust didn’t bring much happiness than before the war. Bladed also became cheap and doubtful. The lasting effect also has on the next generation. Artier is the son of Bladed and Ninja, he was growing up in a very negative condition, he had night mare about the AS will take him away from school and put him in the gas chamber. He even felt guilty because he was not going thought the bas conditions with his parents. All the terrible stories and incidents put him in the guilty to his parents. The lasting effects are tearing family apart. In conclusion, Nazis’ discrimination started this horrific event, Jews hurt each other to survive urine the Holocaust, and all the bad experiences brought huge lasting effects. Nazis forced Jews to hide in anywhere they can and living like rats. They stuffed Jews like animals in the carriage without food and water. Brutal killing by Nazis proved the fact that Jews were not humans in Nazis’ eyes. During the Holocaust, even family can betray each other, Rabbi’s son could gave up on his father when he was only getting weaker. The holocaust’s lasting effect still can kill people. Ninja suicide because she was not able to bear the loss of her parents and siblings. Bladed treated his son impatiently and suspicious his wife. How to cite The Holocaust, Papers

Hairball Essay Example For Students

Hairball Essay A solitary woman sits in conversation with a benign tumour that had just recently been removed from her ovary. As the woman speaks, the inanimate tumour, which she has named Hairball, looks on from its glass encased perch atop the fireplace. The scene is macabre and certainly unusual, but such is the life of Kat, the main character in Margaret Atwood’s short story, Hairball. Kat’s life is filled with the unusual and the shocking, a lifestyle that has been self-imposed. Throughout the years, Kat, an avant garde fashion photographer, has altered her image, even her name, to suit the circumstances and the era. Over time Kat has fashioned a seemingly strong and impenetrable exterior, but as Kat’s life begins to disintegrate we discover that the strong exterior is just a facade devised to protect a weak and fragile interior. Kat’s facade begins to unravel and she undergoes significant personal losses; in fact, the losses go so far as to include her identity or lack there of. As Kat begins to lose control, her mental and physical disintegration is hastened by three major conflicts: The conflict with the society in which she lives, the conflict with her romantic interests (specifically Ger), and finally the physical conflict she faces with her own body. In the end, these conflicts will threaten to strip Kat of her lifestyle as well as her name. From the beginning of Kat’s life, she was at odds with her environment. When she was a child, she was Katherine, a doll like representation of what her mother wanted her to be. As a teenager she was Kathy, a representation of what she believed others wanted, â€Å"a bouncy, round-faced girl with gleaming freshly washed hair and enviable teeth, eager to please and no more interesting than a health-food ad.† By the time she reached University she was the not-so-eager to please Kath, â€Å"blunt and no-bull*censored* in her Take-Back-the-Night jeans and checked shirt and her bricklayer style striped-denim peaked hat† (pp.16). Finally, when she found her way to England, she became Kat, â€Å"the name Kat was economical, street-feline, and pointed as a nail.† The short, hard name was a reflection of her hard demeanor. Kat constantly tried to separate herself from the commonality of her environment. When she was told that her tumor was fairly common her reply wa s that, â€Å"She would have preferred uniqueness.† Kat wanted to stand out; she did not want to be another â€Å"Clarissa, Meliassa or Penelope,† but she understood that conformity, to the values of her society, would be a requirement if she wanted to succeed in her personal and professional life. With this in mind, Kat chose to integrate those values into her own personal approach. She’d shaved off most of her hair, worked on the drop-dead stare, perfected a certain turn of the neck that conveyed an aloof inner authority. What you had to you had to make them believe was that you knew something they didn’t know yet. (p.17)As the conflict between Kat and her society, she finds herself losing the fight. Despite accolades she received while working on the razor’s edge, Kat’s life is less than successful. Her relationships with competitive men and left her broken and hurt. â€Å"Twice she had abortions, because the men in question were not up for the alternative† (pp.17). Kat’s choice to â€Å"Rambo† through her life left her scarred emotionally and physically. Having spent herself in London, Kat was ready for a change. When a man named Gerald came calling from Toronto, Kat saw the opportunity for change and grabbed it. When Gerald showed up in London offering Kat an attractive job and salary, she found it hard to resist. When Kat arrived back in Toronto and began working with Gerald, she found him hard to resist. The fact that Kat and Gerald were polar opposites appealed to Kat. She saw Gerald as a fresh canvass on which she could fashion her own masterpiece. Kat began by seducing Gerald in his office. She continued by rearranging Gerald’s tastes for clothes and hair style; she even went so far as to change his name to Ger. In the end she had succeeded in turning Ger into the man she wanted him to be, or so she thought. .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac , .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac .postImageUrl , .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac , .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac:hover , .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac:visited , .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac:active { border:0!important; } .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac:active , .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u71807963deb68cc21a78dbb6a2eea1ac:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: AfroAmer EssayHe’s a money man who lusted after art, and now he’s got some, now he is some. Body art. Her art. She’s done her job well; he’s finally sexy. (p.21)As time went on it became apparent that Ger was losing interest. The more Ger became like Kat, the less interest he took in her. It seems that Kat had forgotten what she had known in London. Kat had known better than to â€Å"betray her desire,† but it was obvious that she had betrayed it to Ger. Ger follow suit by betraying Kat as well. After Kat’s surgery for the tumor, Ger comes to visit. When he arrives Kat can’t help but notice his aloofness. Ger makes small tal k but leaves rather quickly. Kat immediately notices a change in their relationship. She thinks it is Ger who has lost his attractiveness, that their relationship has become old and antiquated. Kat surmises,He’s no longer fully rewarding. They’ve learned each other too well, they take short-cuts now; their time together has shrunk from whole stolen rolling and sensuous afternoons to a few hours snatched between work and dinner-time. (pp.20)It is at this time that Kat also realizes that something is not right at work. The phone calls for her input have been few and far between since she checked into the hospital. Kat begins to wonder if her job is in jeopardy. In a fit of panic Kat rushes to work to inspect her hunch. When she arrives at work her worst fears are realized. Ger breaks the news to Kat that she has been fired. Although this news is devastating, it pales in comparison to the news that her replacement is none other than Ger him self. Kat realizes that her cre ation, Ger, has become Frankenstein’s Monster. She muses, â€Å"Naturally. Betrayal. The monster has turned on its own mad scientist† (pp. 21). Back in her apartment Kat realizes that all along it has been Ger and life with that she has been longing after. She understands that the Ger she had created killed the Gerald that she was initially attracted to. Only as Kat’s conflict with Ger comes to the apex does she realize the conflict within herself. As Kat stares at hairball she understands that her life’s struggles have been in vain. Kat comes face to face with the realization that, while Ramboing her way through life, she has missed her opportunity for happiness. Kat has squandered away her life with empty relationships and fruitless jobs. Kat wants the house with the white picket fence, the 2.5 children and the dog but understands none of those are in the foreseeable future. What Kat does see is Hairball, the â€Å"warped child† of her relationship with Ger. The tumor is not only symbolic of Kat’s relationship with Ger but also of her relationship with herself. The physical abuse her body has taken because of Kat’s lifestyle, including the abortions, has now become manifest in Hairball. Kat’s lack of foresight has caused the destruction of her mental and physical well being. Eventually, Hairball becomes the vehicle for the ultimate bizarre act reflecting Kats personality disintegration. She has gone from Katherine, to Kath, to Kat to being â€Å"temporarily without a name.†The journey that Kat takes through the story, from a person defined by others to a person without definition, is somewhat of a birth in reverse. In the story the character of Kat is defined by the conflicts she faces and her inability to adequately deal with them. The more Kat attempts to find herself within the parameters of her society, work and relationships, the more she becomes lost. It is the conflicts that bring Kat to a moment of clarity as she is left broken and abandoned. It is in this state that Kat is able to lose her name and begin to reconstruct herself apart from the influences of others. Without a name Kat is now the blank canvass onto which she hopes to paint her final masterpiece. .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc , .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc .postImageUrl , .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc , .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc:hover , .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc:visited , .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc:active { border:0!important; } .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc:active , .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u9cf68ad0b99e10d534c7ed9da526d4bc:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Describe the adaptations of the human placenta and foetus to improve oxygen availability Essay Bibliography: